Matters involving subcontracting are best left to the discretion of
the general contractor. The percentage of work the contractor plans to
subcontract, the form of subcontract to be utilized, and the manner in
which the subcontract packages will be broken down are all issues to be
decided by the contractor based on his needs and the needs of the
project. Those decisions form the basis for that contractor’s
competitiveness and quality.
With specific regard to public work, the issues of SUBLISTING,
SUBCONTRACTOR APPROVAL, SUBCONTRACTING
LIMITATIONS, SUBCONTRACTOR
AGREEMENTS, and SUBCONTRACTOR
PAYMENTS are discussed below.
SUBLISTING: Sublisting requirements on
public work have been viewed by the courts in New York State, most
notably in the case of GBC v. the City of Syracuse, as illegal
forms of prequalification. Likewise, viewing the qualifications of the
low prime bidder in the light of his proposed subcontractors and
suppliers is inappropriate. Award is to be based solely on the
responsibility of the prime bidder.
As a practical matter, requirements for the listing of subcontractors
at the time of bid are daunting and stifling. Oft times, subcontract
prices are not provided prime bidders until minutes prior to bid
opening. It is tough enough, although a task to which the industry is
accustomed, to make the decision about what number to plug into the
overall bid. To ask, in addition, that the contractor fully analyze the
sub-bids for scope and quality of subcontractor and then come to an
agreement is simply not practical. As an owner, you typically take up to
45 days to make such a decision on the prime contractor. It is unfair to
ask that prime, who carries a great deal of risk, to make such a
decision in minutes.
SUBCONTRACTOR APPROVAL:
Owners, both public and private, have the right of subcontractor
approvals or, as the case may be, disapprovals where objective facts
dictate. Clauses in AIA’s A701, Instructions to Bidders, and A201,
General Conditions, are instructive as to the process. On public work,
talk of a change in price is inappropriate. It amounts to negotiation
and is subject to abuse.
SUBCONTRACTING LIMITATIONS:
Attempts to limit the ability of the general contractor to subcontract
work with requirements of 25%, 35% or even 50% self-performance unduly
hamstring the contractor. That matter should be left to the discretion
of the prime bidder to determine the best and most efficient way to
complete the project on time and within budget. Given the nature of the
industry today, particularly in building construction, such requirements
are not practical.
More important, such restrictions are arbitrary and anti-competitive
on public work. There is no empirical evidence that would suggest that
those who subcontract more than a given percentage of the work are not
qualified. In the case of GBC v. Marathon C.S.D., the
Commissioner of Education states, "There is no authority in the law
for imposing such a restriction."
SUBCONTRACT AGREEMENTS:
Requirements that the general contractor use specific subcontract
agreement forms invade upon the prerogatives of the contractor in his
relationships with subcontractors. It is the prime contractor who
guarantees the work, who puts up a bond, and who is ultimately
responsible for his subcontractors’ indiscretions in many areas. With
the exception of certain flow-down clauses in the prime contract,
contractors should be left to determine and put in place the management
tools necessary to the situation. It is no more equitable to dictate in
this area than it would be for the government to dictate to owners what
forms of contract to use.
In addition, owners need to understand that subcontract agreements
are proprietary documents that are not their concern except that there
are certain contractual requirements of the prime that must be passed
on.
SUBCONTRACTOR PAYMENT: Like
the subcontract agreement above, this is a freedom to contract issue.
Payment is a primary subcontract management tool. Invasion into this
process by dictating retainage amounts or, worse, engaging in direct
subcontractor payments can seriously hinder the contractor’s ability
to complete the work. For more information regarding timing of payment
and retainage click here.